“We approach two paths; one is based on becoming divine by expanding our consciousness, the other is focused on becoming god in a materialistic way using technology. I believe both will become reality, revealing the soul of the decider…” –John Lipscomb, (minute 40, Trance-Formation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0PykgS42wo)
While I think Max Igan has made an important film with Trance-Formation in apprising us of the danger posed by technology, it’s still playing with the classic Gnostic memes, offering a “child’s choice” between good and evil. One has to accept the idea that a human becomes divine by conscious exploration. Igan, Lipscomb, Icke, and others suggest we choose “good”, not because we ARE good but because we must choose –an affect, in this meme, of the primal split in the Godhead. Trance-formation opens with a quote that echos the belief of Hans Jonas: man himself is the origin of all common evil, and no event in our known history was more intentionally designed to force the Choice between good and evil than the creation of atomic weapons. Except maybe invasion by Aliens.
*
War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness
“War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness” is a title given to one of the first seven
Dead Sea Scrolls acquired by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“This kind of apocalyptic sensibility was a discernible strain of Jewish thought at the time of Jesus… Armageddon: the war to end all wars… inevitable conflict [as] the final focus on the dark side of human nature, the ultimate catharsis that ushers in an age of peace.” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/portrait/scrolltranslation.html According to wikipedia, the War scroll was published in 1955, seven years after the discovery of the DDS was announced in April of 1948.
1955 was the year of H-bomb detonations in the U.S., no longer ‘experimental’, mass distribution of the first global vaccine, the Salk IPV, and a newly operating nuclear reactor (Soreq) in Israel.
*
CNN interviews Michio Kaku on Alien Invasion:
Interviewer: “I’m wondering if there can’t be an upside to all this. I’m a big fan of the original Star Trek series and it was only when there were alien civilizations that seemed to challenge the Earth that you found that the Earth got its act together for the kind of global governance that all the visionaries say we’re going to need if we’re going to deal with climate change..[and] all the modern issues [i.e.] global finance… The sovereignty of individual nations is actually a political barrier to solving these big problems. So, can there be an upside to the Alien threat?”
Michio Kaku: “Believe it or not, when President Ronald Reagan met with Mikhail Gorbachev we now know during the transcripts of the meeting that he said if we were ever attacked by the Martians, you and me, the Soviets and the capitalist U.S., would be allies in the fight against the Martians. Well, that’s how Ronald Reagan looked at it and..there’s some truth to it. If we’re faced with a common enemy in outer space it would indeed help to unite the Earth just the way Ronald Reagan said.”
>>>Kaku, a protege of Edward Teller, is a major proponent of Transhumanism, suggesting in the future we choose to merge with machines. In this youtube clip he puts the sexy spin on living forever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tcigdvlM4E Kaku says,
“it may be twenty years away, it may be a thousand, but most experts agree the technological Singularity is inevitable… We cannot predict what these super-intelligent machines will do. They will have their own goals and may stop at nothing to fulfill them. They may even choose to eliminate everything that stands in their path, including us.” http://www.conspiracy-cafe.com/apps/videos/videos/show/15001679-michio-kaku-nwo-agent-of
*
Dr. Steven Greer: “This is the biggest story in the history of the United States. This is the biggest secret.. bar none. Nothing comes close, not the H-bomb, and I have a document to prove it. It says that… it was more tightly controlled than even the H-bomb being developed…
“If you’re not willing to put your neck out for something this important, universal peace, interplanetary relations, a new civilization that has no pollution, free energy, abundance for the elimination of poverty in the world, if you’re not willing to take a risk for that, you don’t have a soul. You’re not worthy of breathing the free air of Earth.”
Bottom line, Greer’s comment is the prevailing tenor in the backstory of the film
THRIVE, however,
THRIVE’s creator and host Foster Gamble expresses his own belief that
“people are not that competent” –not competent as deciders and choosers– a masque for elite contempt that never offers valid choices in the first place.
http://jenniferlake.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/thrive-or-threat/
*
The “free air” of earth no longer exists.
*

…”Metallic salts have made our air conductive. This means that we and everything around us can transmit and propagate energy… The air no longer supports life in a healthy way… [Another] group of materials found in..environmental samples is unidentifiable fibers… People around the world are developing lesions on their skin that ooze and produce fibers..[that] produce colonies of filaments..[that] continue to grow and reproduce… You’re looking at a tubular fiber with self-replicating internal elements resembling bacteria and behaving like archaea… It appears that within our bodies we now have all three Life Kingdoms replicating themselves… Are we becoming something else?…” –Sofia Smallstorm, minute 23,
From Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzW5Kb8u0Og [also, see this informative technology page from Dutchsinse on weather control:
http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/want-to-know-about-weather-modification-haarp-vlf-hf-and-chemtrails-want-to-prove-it-to-a-non-believer-here-you-go/
When the dust settles in our new global atmosphere conducive to extraterrestrial manipulation, choked with particulates and carrier waves, we will indeed
be something else. Radiofrequency effects expert Dr. Neil Cherry added that among the deleterious alterations of RF exposure is the opening of the Blood Brain Barrier.
www.neilcherry.com The visionary Cyborgologists Clynes and Kline offered their recommendations for action in 1960:
"Altering man's bodily functions to meet the requirements of extraterrestrial environments would be more logical than providing an earthly environment...
______________________________________
*
"The first lines of the [War] scroll lay the framework for a three-stage conflict between the Sons of Light..and the Sons of Darkness… the writer of the scroll was particularly concerned with..the very final day of battle.. [and] built his encouragement on a biblical theology of rescue… Coupled with this aspect was his understanding that great suffering was part of God’s will for the redeemed… Ultimately, God’s purpose was to exalt the Sons of Light and to judge the Children of Darkness. The message is one of hope… God was preparing to intervene and bring a permanent solution for the problem of evil.
…The Sons of Light and the forces of Darkness shall fight together to show the strength of God… It is a time of distress for all the people who are redeemed… In all their afflictions none exists that is like it, hastening to its completion as an eternal redemption.”
*
Compare…
“[The] three-fold corollary of Nihilist thought. First, the corollary of the Nihilist annihilation of the Old Order is the conception of a “new age”–”new” in an absolute, and not a relative, sense. The age about to begin is not to be merely the latest, or even the greatest, of a series of ages, but the inauguration of a whole new time; it is set up against all that has hitherto been. “It may be,” said Nietzsche in a letter of 1884, “that I am the first to light upon an idea which will divide the history of mankind in two”; as the consequence of this idea, “all who are born after us belong to a higher history than any history hitherto.” Nietzsche is, of course, blinded by his pride; he made no original “discovery” but only found words for what had been “in the air” already for some time. Precisely the same idea, in fact, was expressed twelve years earlier by Dostoyevsky in the person of Kirillov, the most extreme of the “possessed”: Everything will be new … then they will divide history into two parts: from the gorilla to the annihilation of God, and from the annihilation of God to the transformation of the earth, and of man physically.”
*
New Age, New Earth, New Man
The extraterrestrial objective, in its dualistic twin aspects of “manipulative” and “ethical” is described in this essay on Nihilism:
[edited excerpt]
“The first and most obvious item in the program of Nihilism is the destruction of the Old Order. The Old Order was the soil, nourished by Christian Truth, in which men had their roots…Effective war against God and His Truth requires the destruction of every element of this Old Order; it is here that the peculiarly Nihilist “virtue” of violence comes into play… Demagogic incitement of the masses and the arousing of the basest passions for revolutionary purposes have long been standard Nihilist practice… No place is secure from the encroaching empire of this Nihilism; everywhere men feverishly pursue the work of “progress”–for what reason they do not know, or only very dimly sense.. activity that promises forgetfulness of the spiritual emptiness that attends all worldliness… [It] is a cold, inhuman world that men without God are fashioning..; the same spirit is present in the disease of total planning… The destruction of the Old Order, however, and the organization of the “new earth”..are but the preparation for a work more significant and more ominous than either: the “transformation of man.”
This was the dream of the pseudo-Nietzscheans, Hitler and Mussolini, of a “higher humanity” to be forged through a “creative” violence; “this is the mission of our century,” said Hitler’s propagandist Rosenberg: “out of a new life myth to create a new human type.”…Putting aside for the moment the question of what kind of men are to be produced by this process, let us note carefully the means utilized: it is again violence, which is as necessary to the formation of the “new man” as it is to the building of a “new earth.” The two, indeed, are intimately connected in the determinist philosophy of Marx, for “in revolutionary activity, change of self coincides with the change of circumstances.” The change of circumstances, and more to the point, the process of changing them through revolutionary violence, transform the revolutionaries themselves. Here Marx and Engels, like their contemporary Nietzsche, and like Lenin and Hitler after them, subscribe to the mystique of violence, seeing a magical change to be wrought in human nature through indulgence of the passions of anger, hatred, resentment, and the will to dominate. In this regard we must make note also of the two World Wars, whose violence has helped to destroy forever the Old Order and the old humanity, rooted in a stable and traditional society, and has had a large role in producing the new uprooted humanity that Marxism idealizes. The thirty years of Nihilist war and revolution between 1914 and 1945 have been an ideal breeding-ground for the “new human type. “
…[T]he most striking forms of Nihilist Vitalism, whose cumulative effect has been to uproot, disintegrate, and “mobilize” the individual, to substitute for his normal stability and rootedness a senseless quest for power and movement, and to replace normal human feeling by a nervous excitability. The work of Nihilist Realism, in practice as in theory, has been parallel and complementary to that of Vitalism: a work of standardization, specialization, simplification, mechanization, dehumanization; its effect has been to “reduce” the individual to the most “Primitive” and basic level, to make him in fact the slave of his environment, the perfect workman in Lenin’s worldwide “factory.”
…Many thinkers are able to see the clear connection between the Nihilist philosophy that reduces reality and human nature to the simplest possible terms, and a Nihilist practice that similarly reduces the concrete man; not a few, also, realize the seriousness and the radicalness of this “reduction” even to the extent of seeing in it, as does Erich Kahler, a qualitative change in human nature. “(The) powerful trend toward the disruption and invalidation of the individual … manifestly present in the most diverse currents of modem life–economic, technological, political, scientific, educational, psychic and artistic–appears so overwhelming that
we are induced to see in it a true mutation, a transformation of human nature.
…What, more realistically, is this “mutation,” the “new man”? He is the rootless man discontinuous with a past that Nihilism has destroyed, the raw material of every demagogue’s dream; the “free-thinker” and skeptic, closed only to the truth but “open” to each new intellectual fashion because he himself has no intellectual foundation; the “seeker” after some “new revelation,” ready to believe anything new because true faith has been annihilated in him; the planner and experimenter, worshipping “fact” because he has abandoned truth, seeing the world as a vast laboratory in which he is free to determine what is “possible”; the autonomous man, pretending to the humility of only asking his “rights,” yet full of the pride that expects everything to be given him in a world where nothing is authoritatively forbidden; the man of the moment, without conscience or values and thus at the mercy of the strongest “stimulus”; the “rebel,” hating all restraint and authority because he himself is his own and only god; the “mass man,” this new barbarian, thoroughly “reduced and “simplified” and capable of only the most elementary ideas, yet scornful of anyone who presumes to point out the higher things or the real complexity of life.
These men are all one man, the man whose fashioning has been the very purpose of Nihilism. But mere description cannot do justice to this man; one must see his image. And in fact such an image has quite recently been portrayed; it is the image of contemporary painting and sculpture, that which has arisen, for the most part, since the end of the Second World War, as if to give form to the reality produced by the most concentrated era of Nihilism in human history. The human form, it would seem, has been “rediscovered” in this art; out of the chaos of total abstraction, identifiable shapes emerge. The result, supposedly, is a “new humanism,” …But what kind of “man” is it to which this art has “returned”? It is certainly not Christian man, man in the image of God, for no “modern” man can believe in him; nor is it the somewhat diluted “man” of the old humanism, whom all “advanced” thinkers regard as discredited and outmoded. It is not even the “man” disfigured and denatured in the earlier “Cubist” and “Expressionist” art of this century; rather, it begins where that art leaves off, and attempts to enter a new realm, to depict a new man. …little reflection should be required to penetrate to the secret of this art: there is no question of “man” in it at all; it is an art at once subhuman and demonic. It is not man who is the subject of this art, but some lower creature who has emerged (“arrived” is Giacometti’s word for it) from unknown depths.
The bodies this creature assumes (and in all its metamorphoses it is always the same creature) are not necessarily distorted violently; twisted and dismembered as they are, they are often more “realistic” than the figures of man in earlier modern art. This creature, it is clear, is not the victim of some violent attack; rather,
he was born deformed, he is a genuine “mutation.” …Even more revealing than the bodies of these creatures are the faces. It would be too much to say that these faces express hopelessness; that would be to ascribe to them some trace of humanity which they most emphatically lack. They are the faces, rather, of creatures more or less “adjusted” to the world they know, a world not hostile but entirely alien, not inhuman but “a-human.”…Man, in this art, is no longer even a caricature of himself; he is no longer portrayed in the throes of spiritual death, ravaged by the hideous Nihilism of our century that attacks, not just the body and soul, but the very idea and nature of man…
The existence of this “new man, whose faith and hope are directed solely to this world, is but another proof of the success of the Nihilist program. The “new man” in his “positive” form is taken from the same photograph of which the subhumanity we have described is the negative. In the negative he is seen as defeated and denatured by an inhuman world; the pessimism and despair of this image–and this is their only positive significance–are a last feeble protest against the work of Nihilism, at the same time that they are a testimony to its success. In the positive, the “new man” has set about to change the world, and at the same time to change his own attitude to one of acceptance of the modern world which, though imperfect, is the only one he knows; in this image there is no more conflict, for man is well on the way to being thoroughly refashioned and reoriented, and thus perfectly “adjusted” to the new world. The two images are one in issuing from the death of man as he has hitherto been known–man living on earth as a pilgrim, looking to Heaven as his true home–and in pointing to the birth of a “new man” solely of the earth, knowing neither hope nor despair save over the things of this world. …
…The new age, which many call a “post-Christian” age, is at the same time the age “beyond Nihilism”–a phrase that expresses at once a fact and a hope. The fact this phrase expresses is that Nihilism, being negative in essence even if positive in aspiration, owing its whole energy to its passion to destroy Christian Truth, comes to the end of its program in the production of a mechanized “new earth” and a dehumanized “new man”: Christian influence over man and over society having been effectively obliterated, Nihilism must retire and give way to another, more “constructive” movement capable of acting from autonomous and positive motives…
…The hope contained in the phrase, “beyond Nihilism,” is the naive one that it has a spiritual as well as an historical reference, that the new age is to see the overcoming of Nihilism and not merely its obsolescence. The god of Nihilism, nothingness, is an emptiness, a vacuum waiting to be filled; those who have lived in this vacuum and acknowledged nothingness as their god cannot but seek a new god and hope that he will lead them out of the age and the power of Nihilism. It is such people who, anxious to draw some positive significance from their situation, and unwilling to believe that the Nihilism through which our age has passed can be entirely unfruitful, have constructed an apology in which Nihilism, however evil or unfortunate it may be in itself, is seen as the necessary means to an end beyond itself, as destruction preceding reconstruction, as darkness preceding the dawn. If the present darkness, uncertainty, and suffering are unpleasant–so this apology continues–they are at the same time beneficial and purifying; stripped bare of illusions, in the midst of a “dark night” of doubt and despair, one can only suffer these trials in patience and remain “open” and “receptive” to what the omnipotential future may bring. Nihilism, it is presumed, is the apocalyptic sign of the advent of a new and better age.”
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/nihilism.html#4
__________________________________________
*
See comment 4, Race to Space about Robert Goddard, Charles Lindbergh, Harry Guggenheim, Carl Jung, Jack Parsons and L.Ron Hubbard.
*
“An event in 1958 led Jung to conclude that it was more desirable for people to believe UFOs exist than to believe they don’t exist. One of his final works, Flying Saucers, was an attempt to answer why it was more desirable to believe in their existence. Jung came to the conclusion that UFOs were examples of the phenomena of synchronicity where external events mirror internal psychic states… For Jung the UFO images had much to do with the ending of an era in history and the beginning of a new one… The symbolism of alien abduction is very different than the old one of colonization… colonization..brings with it the possibility of struggle, of emancipation and independence. Abduction, however, recognizes the futility of resistance… abduction involves the sense that things are happening behind our backs. A great paradox is perhaps at the end of this symbolism as Dean concludes her book with the following: ‘To fight colonization, we take control. We don’t fight abduction; we simply try to recover our memories, all the while aware that they could be false, that in our very recovery we participate in an alien plan.’ ” http://www.meta-religion.com/Psychiatry/Analytical_psychology/symbolism_of_ufos.htm
That manipulative alien in the picture with Bill Clinton bears a striking resemblance with Larry King, a known manipulative alien. Too bad the bottom half is cutt off, otherwise positive identification would be possible by way of size comparison of the reproductive organ.
Comment by Chuck — April 29, 2012 @ 4:18 am |
|That priests essay on nighlism is being less thn honest and a diservice to educating humanaty as i see words like bolshevik,communist etc but no where theword jew,so being less than truthful is equal to lying as one could never know from his info who is at the bottom of this garbage,also his view on history he writes about is debatable.
but more to the topic i was watching soem of that reptilian video about changing shape andreading soemof the literature or writings and it is convincing(I dont give it much credit|)but one does have a tendency to start being a thought changer,lol. (i have changed my thinking alot over theyears so i am 1|)but als there is no need to believe in such fancy ideas as the people responsible for all this are here in front of us all thetime known as jews international finance and rabbis,and lickspittle traitors like worlds(amelikan-euro in great part||) politicians .
Comment by xtimla — May 12, 2012 @ 6:56 am |
–for your consideration:
“Those of us who follow the higher Logos know, however, that the only proper response we can make to our enemies is to love them, and the clearest manifestation of that love is our desire to bring them to the Truth, otherwise known as the Logos.” http://www.darkmoon.me/2012/who-is-the-real-enemy-by-e-michael-jones/
Comment by jenniferlake — May 13, 2012 @ 1:08 pm |
so then we must also bring the logos to satan and itslegionsorlucifer and hislegionslets say rahter one should not hate them as they do us.for the simple reason it brings tou to their level and alsosuit a weaste opf energy.same concept astortue,if you torture to death asadisticnutrdering getshitsnts off on it ,then automatical;ly youbeopme just like hkm that is why it is forbidden ,universal law,and those cretins in thebush adm, who advocate it it are pretty sure people are dumb enough togoalong with ity.|(||||?|)i.e. humnaityiasasso alienated from his source iot goes tright over their heads,it is open contempt .alweays it is the same conundrum|||”wel;l if the little boys father was gouing to blow up skyscrapers in new york and we had to torture him to get him to tell us where his naughty daddy is.same as the one |||||||”well yes i will steal to feed my children scenarion|”imbecilic mind trick on your own idiocybecause it aint gonnahappen ,since when have you had to steal awondwer bread loaf so your lil bastard could eat|? why dont you go shoot a gopher andf erat that.or traop oe they are good tastes ike guinea pig. ok well on n on n on…
Comment by xtimla — May 14, 2012 @ 10:21 am
sorry i will get a knew keyboard tommorrow. lol
Comment by xtimla — May 14, 2012 @ 10:21 am |
lol
Comment by jenniferlake — May 14, 2012 @ 2:27 pm |
Race to Space
“Every liquid-fueled rocket that flies is based on Goddard’s original innovations.” http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Goddard.html
Account of the meetings of Robert Goddard with Charles Lindbergh and Harry Guggenheim:
Goddard had been dreaming of space since boyhood. As a professor at Clark University (Worcester, Mass) he began sharing his private thoughts with Dr. Charles G. Abbot, Asst. Sec. of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington about “rockets that would thrust themselves along by ion propulsion, or by nuclear energy if it ever became available, or by solar sails of reflecting foil… Goddard even considered the possibility of freezing human protoplasm for manned trips that would take much longer than a lifetime. Through the years, Dr. Abbot had filed away the professor’s remote ideas, urging Goddard to concentrate on immediate, practical experiments that would do the Smithsonian real credit…”
“Abbot [himself an astrophysicist] would become the Assistant Secretary at the Smithsonian Institute in 1918… Ten years later, on January 10, 1928, he became the fifth Secretary of the Smithsonian” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_G._Abbot; on May 1, 1929, Abbot created the Division of Radiation and Organisms at the Smithsonian, “Its function is to investigate the effects of radiation upon living organisms, mainly plants” http://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_sic_704
“Goddard was particularly disturbed by German interest in his experiments. In 1923 he received a copy of [a magazine] from a student at Heidelberg… A German group established a Society for Space Travel…and began to fly small devices at a testing field in Berlin. Goddard felt a prophetic shudder. He wrote regularly to Dr. Abbot: ‘I would not be surprised if it were only a matter of time before the research [becomes] something in the nature of a race.’” That ‘student’ was Hermann Oberth, who published “The Rocket into Planetary Space” in 1923. “Oberth became a member of the Verein für Raumschiffahrt (VfR) – the “Spaceflight Society” – an amateur rocketry group that had taken great inspiration from his book, and Oberth acted as something of a mentor to the enthusiasts who joined the Society.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Oberth
According to Lindbergh’s biography by A. Scott Berg, UFO activity was first reported in the 1920s, coincident with the rapid expansion of powered flight, radio and early radar. Could they have been “small devices” powered by radio, used as models to test craft design? The issue of UFOs is raised only once by Berg, in a friendly visit between C.A.L. and Carl Jung in Switzerland where the Lindberghs owned a chalet after WWII. Jung believed the UFOs had a space origin and refused to engage another explanation.
“In 1958, at the advanced age of 83, Jung published a book on UFOs. He told an interviewer that having studied them for “about 12 years … I cannot even say whether they exist or not”…” http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1204.htm
See the Cave Junction, OR picture from 1927 http://ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html –look like a “small device” possibly radio-controlled? Would it have been common to have a camera handy in 1927 or could this be a staged image, recording planned saucer flight like the students in Berlin?
*
[In 1929,] “that fall Goddard arranged to shift his rocket base from Auburn [his home area] to the shell-pocked artillery range called Hell’s Pond on the federal property of Fort Devens. It was at this point that Lindbergh first heard of Goddard through the New York Times. On November 23, 1929, the colonel drove to Worcester from Long Island… Lindbergh asked Goddard..’What would help you most in carrying out your experiments?’… he described that substantial help might be possible…”
…”In the spring of 1930, Lindbergh finally arranged to discuss the Goddard rocket with Daniel Guggenheim, the mining executive and financier, through the latter’s son Harry… Daniel Guggenheim..promised a solution to Goddard’s financial problems… Early in 1930, with the help of the Guggenheim’s and additional support from the Carnegie Institute, the Goddards moved to Roswell, N.Mex., then a small cattle town. They liked what they found… They rented an ample home called Mescalero Ranch… A local rancher named Oscar White offered a piece of his land for their launching range… The land was called Eden Valley… it was a happy omen…”
–all excerpts about Goddard, Lindbergh, et.al. http://books.google.com/books?id=uFIEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA115#v=onepage&q&f=false [1963 LIFE magazine article by Milton Lehman]
Goddard appears to have maintained his Roswell test site until 1942, when he was relocated to Annapolis with his team to continue rocket projects: “For Goddard..[t]here was modest comfort in the news that Army Ordnance had finally accepted his recommedation of an earlier device, a powder-fueled rocket, which he had offered one war earlier, at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland…the prototype rocket became the ‘bazooka’…But for some time military authorities showed little interest in the long-range rocket he had created in Roswell. Eventually in 1942, he and his small crew were invited to..the Naval Experiment Station..”
Photos: http://www.plastiquedesign.com/pdfs/RM_PhotoInsert.pdf
*
The three “fathers” of rocketry are Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Robert Goddard and Hermann Oberth
“The “re-discovery” of Tsiolkovsky by the Soviets happened only in 1923. German rocket pioneer Herman Oberth, in 1923, published his own independent discoveries in the work, “The Rocket into Interplanetary Space,” along side a review on the works of Tsiolkovsky. In-line with the Soviet practice of “finding” Russian “nugget” of invention for major discoveries like light bulb, radio waves, steam engine etc., he was praised as the brilliant genius from the heart of mother Russia, who struggled for years to find official recognition in the atmosphere of ignorance and indifference of czarist Russia. Many of his works were widely published and some international recognition followed. However, in spite of all the Soviet pomp, his most groundbreaking works were accomplished before 1917.” http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Konstantin_Tsiolkovsky
Oberth was brought to the US as a ‘Paperclip’ import to work with von Braun
*
Harry Guggenheim, president of his parents’ foundation since 1924 (Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation) had recently accepted appointments from Herbert Hoover on the National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics (serving 1929-1938) and as Ambassador to Cuba. Guggenheim funding went further to found the Jet Propulsion Center at Caltech, called Guggenheim Aeronautics Laboratory at C.I.T. (GALCIT) in 1930, headed by Theodor von Karman. (The JPL, est.1936, was created by some GALCIT personel and managed by Caltech, famously the short-career home of Pasadena native Jack Parsons, practitioner of Crowley-styled OTO magick and later leader of the main OTO Lodge in the world until his death. Parsons invited L.Ron Hubbard to live on his property in the days before Scientology)
More on Hubbard and Jack Parsons: “Jack Parsons & The Curious Origins of the American Space Program” http://www.orlingrabbe.com/Jpar14.htm
According to this source “Parsons..was in the process of trying to convince the Israeli government to build a jet-propulsion laboratory and factory” when he died in an explosion in his Pasadena garage. The author adds “So. The Antichrist wanted to build missiles for Israel… If Parsons had been involved in arms for Israel in 1947, as von Karman said, this would have been just prior to the founding of the state in 1948.” Parsons “Manifesto of the Antichrist”, printed in this link where Parsons called himself ‘Belarion’ and declared, “I, The Antichrist, am come among you…” also prophesied at its 1949 publication that “I shall conquer the world…[and] within nine years [1958] a nation shall accept the Law of the BEAST 666 in my name and that nation will be the first nation of earth…”
*
Theodor von Karman, friend and benefactor to Parsons, was born S.Karman Todor in Budapest and claimed the famed Grand rabbi “Maharal” of Prague as an ancestor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_von_K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judah_Loew_ben_Bezalel; “The Maharal is the subject of a legend concerning the creation of a golem, a creature which he made out of clay to defend the Jews of the Prague..”
…”Some strictly orthodox Jews believe that the Maharal did actually create a golem. Menachem Mendel Schneerson (the last Rebbe of Lubavitch) wrote that his father-in-law, Yosef Yitzchok Schneersohn, told him that he saw the remains of the Golem…” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
Comment by jenniferlake — May 22, 2012 @ 12:58 am |