Jennifer Lake's Blog

April 11, 2020

Genetically Modified: Tag, You’re IT

*

*

“The history of biotechnology is not well known. It comes as a surprise to most people to find out that it was not a scientific discovery. Genetic engineering technology was deliberately devised by a small group of people who were looking for a way to manipulate life according to their own designs and for their own purposes. Once they identified genes as a material basis for life, they figured out how to manipulate them, using recombinant DNA technology, and they immediately found commercial uses for their products.

   “The underlying conceit is what MIT science historian Lily Kay calls the “molecular vision of life.” It came about, she says, as the result of the effort of a few scientists, along with their academic and philanthropic sponsors, who had a shared vision about how they could use genes to reshape science and society. Kay says this small group of people laid claim to DNA as a means to an end, once they decided that it was ‘the secret of life.’

   “This new ‘protein paradigm’ reduced the enormous complexity of life down to a few component parts and provided a biological basis for the idea that microorganisms could be engineered. This was the ‘new biology.’  …And it offered those who adopted it a previously unimagined mastery over both nature and society.” –pp8-9, Uncertain Peril, by Clare Hope Cummings, 2008

*

“The desire for patents and profits sweetened the prospects for all concerned. Kay says the long-standing boundaries between what was ‘public’ and what was ‘private’ were erased as corporate and government interests merged… [And] what emerged was a matrix of control. Biotechnology began to dominate scientific research… In the end, it’s been the triumph of what Kay calls the ‘technocratic approach to life.’ …Whether it was intended or not, the way biotechnology was developed has resulted in a relatively small number of players achieving an unprecedented and overarching level of control over life on earth. It brings to mind the words of Justice William O. Douglas, who warned that ‘ as nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there’s a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.’ “ –pp10-11, ibid.

*****************************

“Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person’s body to track his every movement? There’s actual discussion about that. You will rule on that –mark my words—before your tenure is over.”U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden, asked during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the nomination of John Roberts to be chief justice of the Supreme Court.

*

“We can take proteins, real biological machines, and make them part of a working microelectronic circuit.” –Aleksandr Noy, scientist at Univ. of California Merced, co-author of ACS Nano Letters

*

The source of the two quotes above is from the book “Forbidden Gates” by Tom and Nita Horn, published in 2010. The subject and subheading is “How genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, and human enhancement herald the Dawn of Techno-Dimensional Spiritual Warfare and includes this scenario from Nita: “She asked if the biblical mark of the Beast might be a conspiracy employing specific implantable technology only now available. Her theory was gripping. An occult elite operating behind the U.S. government devises a virus that is a crossover between human and animal disease –let’s say, an entirely new and highly contagious influenza mutation [supposing the 2010 publication was directly referencing the H5N1/H1N1 ‘event’ over years 2005-2009] –and intentionally releases it into the public. A pandemic ensues, and the period between when a person contracts the virus and death is something like like ten days. With tens of thousands dead in a few weeks and the rate of death increasing hourly around the globe, a universal cry for a cure goes out. Seemingly miraculously, the government then steps forward with a vaccine. The only catch…given the nature of the animal-human flu, the ‘cure’…rewrites one’s genetics so that the person is no longer entirely human…[and by] receiv[ing] this antidote would become part ‘beast’…thus…’Mark of the Beast’

At the time of reading Forbidden Gates, shortly after publication, it was with full awareness that a bioinformatics database called BEAST already existed. It’s in the flu notes, posted on this blog. Biblical ‘scripting’ is, to me, the ominous and perversely-expressed harbinger of the spiritual warfare reality.

As far as I’m concerned, a mass of human tagging began with the 1950s polio vaccines and the introduction of the monkey virus ‘contaminant’ SV40, simian virus #40, in the Salk and Sabin formulas. It’s not a gift of altruism that ongoing worldwide polio vaccination has been the goal of Bill Gates and the foundation, though current vaccines are SV40 free. The theory is basically this: Post-Hiroshima biological surveillance and data collection was mandated to the medical team of the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) on the suggestion of 100 years duration. A multigenerational biological tag was the only means then available, lacking nano-device alternatives, and its expected implementation was imminent after 1950 when the ABCC organized for its longterm assignments. Nuclear testing, which began in Nevada in 1951, expanded the mandate to the U.S. population and beyond. Polio-vaxxed Boomers and their descendents are a potentially trackable demographic. Some military-use nonpolio vaccines of the era also contained SV40. Adding to this view is code for the infective SV40 particle, the T-antigen short form –T-ag.  Tag, really. Is that nerd humor?, an ominous and perversely-expressed harbinger?— or just in-your-face who-doo for future surveillance in ABCC’s project management? The ABCC, of course, is long defunct, but SV40 rages on, fascinating as a subject in the development of  biotech. For now, as a model of tagging derived entirely by my own thoughts on it, I’m going with ‘in your face’ and on the hook. The journey of SV40 through research labs as a ‘recombinant’ gene factor parallels the growth of the biotech industry.

*********************************

Who owns your DNA? According to Claire Cummings 2008 book, Uncertain Peril, “Twenty percent of the DNA in the human body is now patented. Many of the genes in your body are already owned by someone else, most likely a pharmaceutical company or an institution. The Regents of the University of California, for instance, own eighty-nine human genes.” –p75, ibid.  Little doubt attends my speculation that an increase in holdings over the last decade put aggregate institutional ownership of human DNA at or near a  majority of stock—live stock. Somehow, between the first successful 1980 “patent on life” case for a genetically-engineered bacterium and the present, ownership of your essential constituents have been transferred to private parties. Quantitatively speaking, only about 10% of ‘you’ is human anyway, long provoking the question of “what is human?” and, by extension, “what is ‘yours’ and ‘not yours’?,” and “when does ‘yours’ become ‘not yours’?”

So far, every time I check into it, the human DNA legal trend is “not yours” and when applied to medical treatment definitely “not yours.” The immune system wrestles with this every day, tasking “self” and “not self,” so I’ll try to work out a parallel here.

*

In the meantime, an example of “not yours”:  “…when the Supreme Court ruled on the [patent] case of Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty, a scientist working at General Electric who’d created a bacterium genetically engineered to consume oil and help clean up oil spills…[his] lawyers argued that since normal bacteria don’t consume oil, Chakrabarty’s bacteria weren’t naturally occurring –they only existed because he’d altered them using ‘human ingenuity.’ Chakrabarty’s victory opened up the possibility of patenting other living things, including genetically modified animals and cell lines, which didn’t occur naturally outside the body. And patenting cell lines didn’t require informing or getting permission from the ‘cell donors.’ “   The bold-type emphasis is my addition to the words of Rebecca Skloot from the book ‘The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks’ whose cervical cancer tumor specimens became the famous ‘immortal’ HeLa cell line in 1951.  Skloot mentions another cell line called ‘Mo,’ harvested by a UCLA doctor in 1976 from the abnormal spleen of a patient named John Moore who suffered from hairy-cell leukemia. “A normal spleen weighs less than a pound; Moore’s weighed twenty-two.” –p199  Some years later, during his ongoing medical follow-up which involved long distance travel to UCLA, Moore’s suspicion was aroused when he attempted to change the arrangements of his medical visits to be closer to home. Accompanying offers of plane tickets and a stay at the Beverly Wiltshire hotel, was  “a  new consent form that said: ‘ I (do, do not) voluntarily grant to the University of California all rights I, or my heirs, may have in any cell line or any other potential product… developed from the blood and/or bone marrow obtained from me.’ “   He circled ‘do’ but at his next visit when the consent form was presented again he circled ‘do not’ and soon learned that ‘Mo’ was reaping a windfall. In 1984 Moore filed suit against the physician and UCLA. His doctor, patent in hand, stood to personally gain $3.5 million from the cell line which “at that point [had] its market value estimated to be $3 billion…  Scientists are quick to point out that John Moore’s cells were exceptional, and few cell lines are actually worth patenting. Moore’s cells produced rare proteins that pharmaceutical companies could use to treat infections and cancer. They also carried a rare virus called HTLV…which researchers hoped to use to create a vaccine that could stop the AIDS epidemic. Because of this, drug companies were willing to pay enormous sums to work with his cells.” –pp201-202, ibid.

Moore lost on the first round, then appealed in 1988 and won. His doctor subsequently appealed and won the ‘right to use patient tissues’ and finally “Nearly seven years after Moore originally filed suit, the Supreme Court of California ruled against him in what became the definitive statement on this issue: When tissues are removed from your body, with or without your consent, any claim you might have had to owning them vanishes… [The court] said that ruling in Moore’s favor might ‘destroy the economic incentive to conduct important medical research,’ and that giving patients property rights in their tissues might ‘hinder research by restricting access to the necessary raw materials’…” –p205, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot, 2010

*****************************

The roots of this blog are mentioned in a post called “A Few Words About the Agenda” from November 2009:

“….I started this blog in July09 in the midst of a “pandemic” that is not happening because of a deep foreboding that the Controls being sought are nearly in hand. There is no rational/logical explanation for things like mandatory vaccines, forced healthcare, carbon-footprint permits and the like when it flies in the face of experiential science. What else can it be but the consolidation of the Plan? Every article here in my blog is telling an aspect of this story; One story about One World, where everything coalesces under…the oligarchy…[until] they own you… In ‘their’ future.. ‘we’ are to be made less than fully human to eliminate their competition…  today achievable in physical fact.  How will we be ‘less than human’ –perhaps by becoming programmable DNA computers. Take a look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_computing

…. The impetus in DNA computing, according to Ehud Shapiro of the Weizmann Institute speaking in 2003, is to find a “molecule that can recognize, cut and join DNA sequences in specific ways”, what he suggests will be “designer enzymes…that can do things and go to places that silicon can’t –such as inside our cells to make and control drugs.” http://www.usc.edu/dept/molecular-science/index.html . Phage and virus already do this naturally –enter our cells and install a program– so the question is begging about the ability of virus-like ‘nano-machines’ harnessed for the activity of synthesizing specific enzymes to run an assembly program. If you were going to ‘assemble’ a DNA computer capable of replicating and replacing its own parts, wouldn’t the ideal machine have an immortal and unlimited source of those parts? Cancer cells are just such an immortal cellular anomaly. A pharmaceutical-generating program that can control cancer cells in the self-performance of chemotherapy has the capacity I would think of becoming an immortal DNA computer, capable of [reproducing] itself with endless ‘perfect copies’ while keeping the overproduction of those cells in check…  Cancer cells may become the needed raw material for constructing immortal bio-bot computers. The staggering potential of DNA computing forecast by Leonard Adleman is that “One gram of DNA can store as much information as a trillion compact discs”. “What’s more”, states the text of the USC webpages above, “myriad DNA molecules can examine every possible [pathway] at once, rather than one at a time as in a conventional computer”. With this much incredible promise, is it likely that the DNA computing science would take a backseat? If I’m on the right track with this projection, a lot of agendas appear to be satisfied. I’m over my head here…  Explanations for the presence of sophisticated and nano-sized materials in food, vaccines and chemtrails are not forthcoming and yet they are turning up in products of every description. At the atomic level, organic, inorganic and cellular materials have new and different properties, most informative of which comes from electrochemical experiments.  As in the past, this new technical platform will be maximally spun-off and exploited in some ultimate pursuit of global mastery… Our bodies will become factories for their bio-bots.

2004– “Recently, simple molecular-scale autonomous programmable computers were demonstrated… allowing both input and output… Such computers, using biological molecules as input data and biologically active molecules as output, could produce a system for ‘logical’ control of biological processes… As proof of principle, we programmed the computer to identify and analyze mRNA of disease-related genes associated with models of…cancer, and to produce a single-stranded DNA molecule modelled after an anticancer drug.” http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v429/n6990/abs/nature02551.html

(end of self-quote from A Few Words About the Agenda)

************************************************************************************

”The goal of the government should be one level of health for all the people” —Florence Mahoney, 1965, reference on p209 of Noble Conspirator, Florence S. Mahoney and the Rise of the National Institutes of Health, by Judith Robinson, 2001

This quote is but one of the select bolshevist utterances of the incomparable ‘health’ lobbyist Mrs. Mahoney. Her principal endeavors focused on population control, mental health treatment and social engineering. The span of her nationally influential activity ranged from the 1940s to the ‘90s and “by the year 2000, the National Institutes of Health had become indisputably the world’s leading research entity across the spectrum of biomedicine.” –271, ibid.

The 2009 H1N1 pandemic-that-wasn’t brought in the government initiative called One Medicine, a cooperative paramilitary organization enlisting MDs and DVMs to jointly respond to public health issues. In essence, the One Medicine goal is to devise common protocols of treatment for humans and animals –symbolically, if not actually, leveling the livestock. In biotechnology this is possible because of  genetic ‘homology’, the cross-species similitude of gene chemistry. In natural settings, homology in viruses, viral vectors and host receptors leads to transmission –and in the case of infectious transmission from animals to humans, known as ‘zoonosis’ (zoh-ahn’-nah-sis). I’ll have to check if ‘humanosis’ or ‘homonosis’ is in the lexicon yet. We’re certainly making the animals we love and depend on very sick with ‘public health’ protocols.

Any government that determines the nature of my human physical matter, whether inside or outside the body, to be “raw material” for “important” economic exploit represents neither myself nor the authority to which I submit.

*

Compare…..

Industrial GMOs have a running track record in agriculture, the subject of Uncertain Peril, sufficiently parallel in models of business and ethics to apply to human engineering. I put in the bracketed [noun] substitutions to make a point:

“There are five solid reasons that genetic engineering is not right for agriculture [medicine]. One: it’s bad science. It was developed on the basis of flawed assumptions which have since been discredited by the scientific community. Two: it’s bad biology. It was deployed without regard for its potential for genetic contamination and risks to human health. Three: it’s bad social policy. It puts control over seeds [medical treatment] and the fundamentals of our food and farms [healthcare] into the hands of a few corporations who have their own, not our, best interests in mind. Four: it’s bad economics. After billions of dollars and thirty [now forty and more] years, only a few products have been commercialized, and they offer nothing new. No one asked for genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and given a choice, consumers would reject them. Five: it’s bad farming [healthcare]. GMOs don’t address the real issues plaguing agriculture [humans]; they’re designed to substitute for or increase the use of proprietary weed and pest [drug] control chemicals. Patented and genetically altered seeds [pharmaceuticals] perpetuate the very worst problems of the industrial food [health] system, and they are undermining the autonomy of the farmers [doctors] who use them.”

*********************8******************************

Underlying Causes and Coronavirus

*

‘You Are What You Eat’ was a government information campaign of the 1970s when biotech was gaining ground in agriculture. The learning program put an emphasis on the benefits of whole grain –certain of which are the gluten/gliadin containing wheat, rye, and barley which we now know compromise the blood-brain barrier, as the glyphosate (Round-up, Agent Orange) herbicide then being introduced compromises the gut by inducing lesions. (That’s subject for another post). The point here is that my earlier influenza research demonstrated that the microbiologists of the last century discovered toxic gut bacteria in the lungs of flu patients, determining it to be the cause of respiratory infection.

Plus this: “…In this account of the discovery of influenza [virus, c1933], researchers at ”Mill Hill” near London accidently infected their lab ferrets with their own flu. [humanosis?] At the time they were experimenting with ‘distemper’, developing a vaccine for the flu-like illness in dogs.”   –see the margin list for “Influenza Special”. If there’s a relationship of gut bacteria to respiratory infection in dogs, I didn’t look for it then, but the common viral agent of contagious gastroenteritis in dogs is coronavirus.  From the Merck Veterinary Manual, 1991 edition: “Coronaviral Gastroenteritis, A highly contagious GI disease of dogs of any age… Canine Coronavirus (CCV) is an enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus antigenically related to the feline coronaviruses (feline infectious peritonitis virus and feline enteric coronavirus) and to transmissible gastroenteritis virus of pigs… Lesions in experimental infections usually are not severe…[but] Naturally occurring cases, especially those with mixed infections, can have severe lesions with frank hemorrhage in the intestinal mucosa…” The 1991 Merck Vet. lists only four species with economically significant coronavirus problems: dogs, cats, pigs and turkeys, but if there are clues in microbe-hunting about CoV transmission, mixed-infections, and treatment, the recommended treatment for Kennel Cough in dogs is vaccines for distemper and parainfluenza (or paramyxovirus infection, PMV) –respiratory infection in turkeys, “which suggests the respiratory tract may be the initial site of infection.” –p1564, ibid.  Bird flu? Do turkeys cough? “The transmission between turkeys is unclear,” so I’ll let that go for the time being. However, turkeys take a wallop with coronavirus! “Coronaviral Enteritis of Turkeys: An acute, highly contagious disease of turkeys characterized by sudden onset… Mortality may be high… The causative agent is a coronavirus, but the clinical disease is complicated by other intestinal viral and bacterial infections… Cold weather, especially freezing, increases survival of the virus.” –p1554.  We’re being told that too, yes? Must be One Medicine on the job. No vaccine for turkeys, says Merck…just quarantine, social distancing, disinfection…  A little global warming would be handy.

A  very different outcome of coronavirus in pigs is the ‘causal agent’ of a frightful disease called ‘vomiting and wasting disease’ (VWD), otherwise known as Coronaviral  hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (HEV) –a brain infection—where “Neonatal pigs become dehydrated, cyanotic, comatose and die…[If] the virus enters a susceptible herd with neonatal piglets, morbidity and mortality may be high… Replication first takes place in the nasal mucosa, tonsils, lungs, and to a very limited extent, in the small intestine [after spread by aerosol]. From these sites of entry, the virus invades…the peripheral nervous system and subsequently spreads to the entire brain stem…” –pp388-389, ibid. I’m posting this not to scare you but to show a greater range of coronavirus. In North America, western Europe, and Australia, where HEV occurs, “Pigs are the only natural host.” This is the kind of information that provokes my attention for bioweapon potential –but ‘bioweapon’ within the meme of low-intensity conflict scenarios. Our ‘common cold’ coronavirus is everywhere.

 

Turn back the clock for a minute on the official U.S. response to SARS in May 2003:

…”Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee. I am Jerome M. Hauer*, Acting Assistant Secretary for Public Health Emergency Preparedness. I appreciate this opportunity to share our Department’s response to the SARS virus within the context of public health emergency preparedness… we have reason to be encouraged by the response to SARS for several reasons. First, the identification of the agent that causes the disease was completed in record time. CDC identified the coronavirus within a few short weeks of receiving the first specimens… We are partnering with industry to organize a full-court press on vaccine development… The Command Center maps the distribution of SARS cases across the globe with geographic information system software for use during our planning discussions. The Command Center did not exist a year ago – it became operational last November [2002]… I recently co-chaired a meeting of the Council of Governments with Mike Byrne of the Department of Homeland Security to bring together health professionals from across the national capital region to aggressively prepare for an outbreak of the SARS virus here… the Department is implementing an aggressive research and development program to develop and acquire biological, chemical, nuclear and radiological countermeasures… The most exciting news in the R&D arena is, of course, Project BioShield, announced by the President on February 3, 2003.” http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/108/Hearings/05072003hearing917/Hauer1433.htm

*Jerome Hauer, you may remember, was on hand for commentary to major NYC TV media the morning of 9-11, providing the tip that ‘Osama bin Laden’ did it. Hauer was then an officer of New York’s emergency operations center and pKroll security, but his earlier career was in bioweaponry. He directed the neighborhood pesticide-spraying campaign against West Nile Virus when it emerged in NYC in 1999.

*

To our sorrow, the legal decoupling of “healthcare” from the biotech industry never happened. It could have, should have, happened long ago in the 1950s and ‘60s amidst the Cold War when advancing biotechnology was pressing countermeasures (like Hauer’s B-C-R protocols) into military operations. The subsequent infiltration and takeover of biotech in medicine forces the euphemism of “healthcare” with the still added integration of I.T. –Information Technology. As I see it, all a very advanced and comprehensive outcome of radiation biology, the mother of modern genetics.

*

In June of 2013, Justice Clarence Thomas (former Monsanto lawyer) wrote the decision on human DNA for the US Supreme Court that, “We hold that a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated,” following more than forty years of neglect while the industry flourished. At stake was the monopolization of a natural gene by one patent holder, able to control its use in research and medicine. The decision opened the pool and, interpreted by the industry, “also said that synthetic genetic material could be patented” –synthetic human DNA. Four years before this decision, August 2009, I posted “Fabricating DNA Evidence” quoting “Scientists in Israel have demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate DNA evidence…if they have access to a DNA profile in a database… without obtaining any tissue from [a] person. ‘You can just engineer a crime scene,’ said [Dr.] Dan Frumkin… ’Any biology undergraduate could perform this.”

*

“Synthetic biology is unregulated and self-governing. No one knows what could occur when synthetic organisms are intentionally and unintentionally let loose into the environment. Creating genes that don’t exist in nature is a dangerous business and there is no way to predict how they will behave in living systems.” –p266, Foodopoly, 2012, by Wenonah Hauter (Food & Water Watch)

*

So, while I’m ‘CoVing-in’ with extra spare time, I’m dwelling on the tagging, tracking, and surveillance milieu of our present situation juxtaposed with notions of human rights because biotechnology is rewriting the genes of our Constitution and incapacitating the judgements therefrom:

 

FYI, The Human Rights which we extend around the globe, and teach to students of ‘public health’, “include but transcend the conventional classes of human rights…in a remarkable variety of international human rights and humanitarian laws… Never before…has there been such universal recognition of the claim that everyone…is entitled to rights—in particular, what have been aptly called ‘life integrity rights.’ These include the right to life, the right to personal inviolability—not to be hurt; the right to be free of arbitrary seizure, detention, and punishment; the freedom to own one’s body and labor; the right to free movement without discrimination; and the right to create and cohabit with family.” –p39, War and Public Health, 2000 updated ed., editors Levy and Sidel.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all [mankind] are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights… [and] that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it… Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly, all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms of government to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security. The history of the present… is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having, in direct object, the establishment of an absolute tyranny… To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world…” A Declaration by the Representatives of the United States of America… July 4, 1776

*

********************

…part two coming soon…

********************

 

 

December 13, 2009

DNA Ownership

“A man inherently owns his body information because it is the only object with which he is naturally endowed and serves as the basis for his future ownership of any other properties. The definition of body information is the sequence of biological codes that determines individual heredity characteristics…
DNA…becomes unique and is consequently acquired by a unique man through a process of his own creation.
…no person is entitled to the set of body information except the man who bears it.
…whether such ownership can be lost…The answer to this question is yes, yet only with one’s explicit and voluntary consent to a well-defined purpose.
…the purpose is binding.”
http://hussle.harvard.edu/~zhang/lab_reports/docs/MR22%20Ownership%20of%20body%20information.pdf
                                                                 ________________________
The DNA Control Grid http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20090227_dna_control.htm ; this article states a 40 year (plus) international endeavor of DNA collection has been going on, with the material residing in the hands of private companies who claim ownership. Individuals who voluntary send in samples for “analysis” to programs purportedly determining ancestry or human migration history, such as the National Geographic Society effort, are giving their DNA to IBM and other integrated databases. Physical samples will enhance new and future genetic projects such as “minimal genome” research. 
                                                                ________________________
In April 2008, a legislative move in Minnesota denied genetic privacy to newborns who’ve been having state mandated blood and tissue collection since 1997. The bill made it harder and more complicated for parents to prevent
the proprietary use of their children’s DNA.
   Twila Brase said that “researchers..are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors…so this is not just about cancer and asthma”
   In this youtube video, she adds that almost all states collect blood and DNA which they hold in perpetuity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrmtMBJjcg

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.